Drawing for BACIO

USPTO serial 76255042

BACIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BACIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Cyril Malloy, III

JOHN CYRIL MALLOY III HISTORIC CORALMALLOY & MALLOY, PA2800 SW 3RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129-2317

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030ice creamACTIVENov 15, 2001
035franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of ice cream parlors; retail store featuring gelatoACTIVENov 15, 2001
042interior decoration consultation, namely sign, equipment and fixture placement to allow for the most ergonomically efficient and marketable operation of ice cream parlors; catering services; ice cream parlorsACTIVENov 15, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 10, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance