Drawing for RECCLAIM

USPTO serial 76255222

RECCLAIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECCLAIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginia L. Carron

VIRGINIA L CARRON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Manufacturing chemicals, namely, inorganic and organic solid substances recovered from aqueous waste materials containing fine solids suspended therein and chemical products incorporating such substances, all for manufacturing use in the paper industry; inorganic and organic solid chemical substances for manufacturing use in the paper making and paper coating industry; paper filler chemicals for manufacturing use in the paper industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 11, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 11, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 5, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 5, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance