USPTO serial 76255271
NOC.WATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOC.WATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Crystal Bay, NV
Crystal Bay, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Christopher Farrell
MARK CHRISTOPHER FARRELL LEE & HAYES PLLC421 W RIVERSIDE AVE STE 500SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical device, namely, a patient monitor for fall prevention | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |