USPTO serial 76255394
VOIP-7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOIP-7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Sandlin Grimm
M SANDLIN GRIMM MORRIS MANNING & MARTIN LLP3343 PEACHTREE RD NE STE 1600ATLANTA, GA 30326-1044UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOL SOFTWARE USED TO CONTROL VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL GATEWAYS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SWITCHES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 005 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOL SOFTWARE USED TO CONTROL VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL GATEWAYS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SWITCHES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 007 | TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ENHANCED SIGNALING SYSTEM | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 009 | TANDEM SWITCHES; COMPUTER TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE | ACTIVE | Mar 21, 2001 |
| 038 | PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS GATEWAY SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE TRANSMISSION OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL BASED COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | Mar 21, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NACT Telecommunications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named VOIP-7
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |