Drawing for ON-LINE MARKETPLACE

USPTO serial 76255445

ON-LINE MARKETPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ON-LINE MARKETPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RAYMOND G. AREAUX

RAYMOND G AREAUX CARVER DARDEN KORETZKY TESSIER ET AL1100 POYDRAS ST STE 2700NEW ORLEANS, LA 70163-2700UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail services featuring clothing, novelty gift items, books, home furnishings,computers, and computer peripheralsACTIVEJan 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 30, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 13, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 26, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 30, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 30, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 3, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 10, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 19, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 19, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Sep 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance