USPTO serial 76255458
GLACIER FIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2005
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLACIER FIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
DARTMOUTH, CA
WORLDWIDE DIAMOND TRADEMARKS LIMITED
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by WORLDWIDE DIAMOND TRADEMARKS LIMITED
WORLDWIDE DIAMOND TRADEMARKS LIMITED
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by WORLDWIDE DIAMOND TRADEMARKS LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya M. Reitzel
Tanya M. Reitzel Coastal Trademark Services1081 Cambie StreetVANCOUVER, BC, V6B5L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | DIAMONDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by H.R.A. INVESTMENTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by H.R.A. INVESTMENTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CHARM JEWELRY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WORLDWIDE DIAMOND TRADEMARKS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WORLDWIDE DIAMOND TRADEMARKS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named GLACIER FIRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 30, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |