Drawing for GREAT RELATIONSHIP BANK

USPTO serial 76255632

GREAT RELATIONSHIP BANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREAT RELATIONSHIP BANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Serritella

JOSEPH J SERRITELLA PEPPER HAMILTON LLPEIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009magnetically coded and electrically encoded integrated circuit cards containing programming used to implement banking and financial services; and prepaid telephone calling cardsACTIVE—
035promoting the sale of the goods and services of others by awarding discounts and purchase points for credit card use and through the administration of incentive award programs; credit card registration servicesACTIVE—
036banking services, namely, banking and credit, debit and stored value card and electronic transaction services via a global computer information network; telephone calling card services; cash replacement by credit card; credit card transaction processing services; electronic cash transactions; electronic credit card transactions; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; financial information provided by electronic means; brokerage services in the fields of insurance, investments, mortgages, mutual funds, securities and stocks; insurance consultation; investment advice and consultation; funds investment; mutual funds investment; personal financial management and planning; cash management; loan financing and financing services; home equity loans; installment loan and loan financing; security services, namely, monitoring, detecting and preventing fraud in financial transactions in the fields of banking, credit cards, and prepaid telephone calling cards; credit card insurance services; checking account services; savings account services; and currency exchange and adviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 16, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 27, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance