USPTO serial 76255641
VIRTUAL PAPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2007
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIRTUAL PAPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Virtual Paper Gmbh - The Digital Media Company
Munich, DE
Other trademarks owned by Virtual Paper Gmbh - The Digital Media Company
Virtual Paper Gmbh - The Digital Media Company
Munich, DE
Other trademarks owned by Virtual Paper Gmbh - The Digital Media Company
Virtual Paper Gmbh - The Digital Media Company
Munich, DE
Other trademarks owned by Virtual Paper Gmbh - The Digital Media Company
Munich, DE
Munich, DE
Munich, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad R. Maurer, Amie Peele Carter, M. Sue Michael, and Meg A. Gallmeyer
ERIC J GROEN BAKER & DANIELS LLP300 N MERIDIAN ST STE 2700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Transmission of data via telecommunications networks, namely, transmission of multimedia presentations on the Internet; providing multimedis and computer program data that may be shared with and exchanged between networks users via local area, wide, wide area, and global networks; providing multiple-user access to local area, wide area, and global computer networks; and providing multiple-user access to an information network featuring on-line newspapers, magazines, books, encyclopedias and dictionaries in the fields of entertainment, education, science, digital rights management, and billing and distribution systems for multimedia content | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing and developing multimedia presentations for others; designing and developing digital storage media, namely, computer disks, magnetic computer tapes, smart media cards, memory sticks, multimedia cards, flash memory modules, compact disks, CD-ROMs, and DVDs for others; computer programming for others; and database development services for digital databases featuring multimedia data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Paper Gmbh - The Digital Media Company
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Paper Gmbh - The Digital Media Company
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Paper Gmbh - The Digital Media Company
- Other trademarks owned by Borgward, Glenn Rolus
- Other trademarks owned by Borgward, Glenn Rolus
- Other trademarks owned by Borgward, Glenn Rolus
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIRTUAL PAPER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 6, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |