USPTO serial 76256207
CONCRETE XTREME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONCRETE XTREME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated machines, namely concrete saws and saw blades, but not including reciprocating saws and reciprocating saw blades | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |