Drawing for LOTTERY FOR LIFE

USPTO serial 76256338

LOTTERY FOR LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOTTERY FOR LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary J. Pitzer

GARY J PITZER AMIN & TUROCY, LLP24TH FL NATIONAL CITY1900 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-3404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in administering lottery services, tracking lottery purchases, selling lottery tickets, and storing information relating thereto and instructional materials distributed with the softwareACTIVE—
036Investment and management of funds for others, namely, investing a portion of the purchase price of tickets for games of chance, sweepstakes, and lotteries; providing investment account information via the InternetACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, conducting games of chance, sweepstakes and lotteries for others; administering lottery services for others namely, auditing and tracking lottery purchases and providing information relating theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Sep 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance