USPTO serial 76256350
E-MODULE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-MODULE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
78320 La Verriere, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M. KUHN
PERLA M KUHN HUGHES HUBBARD & REED1 BATTERY PARK PLZ FL 12NEW YORK, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Locks and anti-theft locks of metal for vehicles, keys | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2003 |
| 009 | Components and devices for use with motor vehicles, namely, rain sensors, electronic control devices for windscreen wiper motors, electronic control devices for locks, electronic control device for the rear lighting of the vehicle, circuit breakers; on-board communications networks for vehicles comprised of electronic central processing units, electronic memories,micro-processors, electrical distribution harnesses, electric vehicle wiring, remote controllers and receivers, and connecting boxes; software for controlling car electric equipment; liquid level sensors, oil level sensors, temperature sensors, controls for adjusting the beam of headlights,sensors for adjusting the beam of headlights, control modules for electric motors, on-board computers, electric locks, remote control systems for locking or unlocking the doors, the trunk or the litigate of a vehicle; electronic badges containing security data for electronic locks, electronic badges made from electronic circuit board and electronic circuitry; transponders, ultrasonic transducers | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2003 |
| 011 | Lighting installations for vehicles, namely, signaling lights for vehicles; indicator lights for signaling lights | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2003 |
| 012 | bonnet, doors, hatchbacks, bumpers, license plates for vehicles; windscreen wipers and parts therefor, namely, windscreen wiper blades, reduction gears, windscreen washers, windscreen washer tanks, vehicle door handles | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VALEO SYSTEMES D'ESSUYAGE
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named E-MODULE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |