USPTO serial 76256749
BUNCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUNCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW A. NEWBOL.ES
MATTHEW A NEWBOL.ES ENTERPTISESTETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SLOT MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |