USPTO serial 76256778
THE SALAMANDER TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SALAMANDER TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Gryce
JONATHAN S JENNINGS PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY HILLIARD ET311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabrics, namely, wool, linen, cotton, chenille, polyester, nylon, ramie, rayon, brocade, hemp cloth, canvas cloth, silk cloth, jute cloth, cloth of gold; and fabric used in the manufacture of draperies, comforters, sheets, shams, upholstery, window coverings, bedspreads, pillowcases, wall coverings, towels, shower curtains, table cloths and linens, carpets and rugs, excluding fabrics used in the manufacture of shoes, purses and clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |