Drawing for LEAN BITES

USPTO serial 76256858

LEAN BITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAN BITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard D. Clarke

DR BRUCE L HOWE DOCTORS FOR NUTRITION INCSTE 1005375 MIRA SORRENTO PLSAN DIEGO, CA 92121

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional and dietary supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 11, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 11, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 18, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 16, 2003LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
May 16, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 5, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance