Drawing for ASPINWALL

USPTO serial 76256950

ASPINWALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2657363Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 3, 2002
Examiner
KREBS, CATHERINE K.
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASPINWALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond R. Ferrera

RAJESH P KUMAR435 B-1 F M 1092, # 180STAFFORD, TX 77477UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant and carry-out services featuring coffee and teaSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDAug 21, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2006C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 10, 2006CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 5, 2006CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 3, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 2, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 15, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 5, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance