Drawing for REMOTELOGIC

USPTO serial 76257076

REMOTELOGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REMOTELOGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alison B. Shames

ALISON B SHAMES HOWARD RICE, NEMEROVSKI, ET ALTHREE EMBARCADERO CTR7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software and devices for use in connection with managing and tracking people, goods and/or access to and from secured locationsACTIVESep 5, 2001
042computer services, namely, managing and tracking people, goods and/or access to and from secured locations via the InternetACTIVESep 5, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 4, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 11, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance