USPTO serial 76257238
MUSZYNKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSZYNKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
34-650 TYMBARK, PL
34-650 TYMBARK, PL
COCA-COLA POLAND SERVICES SPOLKA Z O.O.
00-609 WARSZAWA, PL
Other trademarks owned by COCA-COLA POLAND SERVICES SPOLKA Z O.O.
00-232 Warszawa, PL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Vande Sande
THOMAS J VANDE SANDE HALL PRIDDY MYERS & VANDE SANDE10220 RIVER RD STE 200POTOMAC, MD 20854-4932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | mineral water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MULTIVITA SP. ZO.O.
- Other trademarks owned by MULTIVITA SP. ZO.O.
- Other trademarks owned by COCA-COLA POLAND SERVICES SPOLKA Z O.O.
- Other trademarks owned by Multico Sp. z o.o.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MUSZYNKA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |