USPTO serial 76257244
ELEMENTS WHOLE HEALTH PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELEMENTS WHOLE HEALTH PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael V. LiRocchi, Esq.
MICHAEL V LIROCCHI ESQ LANAHAN & REILLEY LLP3558 ROUND BARN BLVD STE 300SANTA ROSA, CA 95403-0992UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance brokerage and consultation; Administration of pre-paid health care plans; Underwriting insurance for pre-paid health care; Organizing pre-paid Health care plans; Underwriting in the field of health insurance | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1999 |
| 042 | Counseling in the field of health; Providing health information; Managed health care services | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |