USPTO serial 76257315
I-QUALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I-QUALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VALERIE DU LANEY
VALERIE DU LANEY MILLER NASH LLP4400 TWO UNION SQ601 UNION STSEATTLE, WA 98101-2352Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely, providing consultation services in the field of the development of, and applications for, information systems for supply chain management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |