USPTO serial 76257399
CENTER FOR MARINE CONSERVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CENTER FOR MARINE CONSERVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shrinath Malur
SHRINATH MALUR MATTINGLY STANGER & MALUR PC104 HUME AVEALEXANDRIA, VA 22301-1015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION AND PUBLIC POLICY AWARENESS PROGRAMS FOR THE OCEANS, OCEAN LIFE AND CORAL REEFS; FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, NAMELY REVIEWING AND ADVOCATING STANDARDS AND PRACTICES FOR ENSURING COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING OCEANS, OCEAN LIFE AND CORAL REEFS; FOR PROVISION OF GENERAL AND LOCAL NEWS AND INFORMATION PRIMARILY OF INTEREST TO OCEAN ENVIRONMENTALISTS IN THE AREAS OF POLITICS, POLICIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS; FOR PROMOTING INTERESTS IN THE FIELD OF POLITICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AFFECTING OCEANS, OCEAN LIFE AND CORAL REEFS; FOR PROMOTING COASTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS; AND FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF MARINE ENVIRONMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |