USPTO serial 76257424
PROVIDER LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2958727Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2005
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROVIDER LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A. Tassan
BRUCE A TASSAN4143 27TH ST NARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR INDIVIDUALS TO STORE THEIR PERSONAL MEDICAL AND HEALTHCARE INFORMATION ON A PORTABLE STORAGE DEVICE AND ALLOWING THE UPDATE OF THE INFORMATION ON THIS DEVICE BY THE INDIVIDUAL AND MEDICAL PROVIDERS NOT USING THE INTERNET | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 4, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |