Drawing for BED-HEAD BUDDY

USPTO serial 76257507

BED-HEAD BUDDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3462752Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 8, 2008
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BED-HEAD BUDDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE F. KONDOR

GEORGE F. KONDOR OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA LLP480-601 WEST CORDOVA STREETVANCOUVER, V6B1G1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020PillowsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 25, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2015C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 13, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 13, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 3, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 8, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 15, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 24, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance