Drawing for SINGLESOURCETECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76257604

SINGLESOURCETECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SINGLESOURCETECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANA A. SCHWIND

DANA A SCHWIND MORRIS MANNING & MARTIN LLP3343 PEACHTREE RD STE 1600ATLANTA, GA 30326UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business services that provide fringe benefits for customers' employees and the administration thereof namely, (1) payroll processing, tax filing and compliance management; (2) retirement planning services and products and the administration thereof; (3) cafeteria plans and the administration thereof; (4) voluntary payroll deduction products and the administration thereof; (5) fringe benefit and voluntary payroll deduction enrollment services; (6) programs and services to business and their employees, namely prepaid legal services, pre-employment screening, drug testing and screening, anti-harassment training programs, employee assistance programs, educational loan assistance programs, employee handbook development services, HIPAA and COBRA administration, human resources assistance, and employee leasing; and, web-based services that provide employee full-time access to information respecting account information, benefit change requests, access to employee handbook, other company information, and, web-based services that provide business full-time access for reports, payroll submissions and information, and historic information respecting existing and terminated employeesACTIVEMar 5, 2001
036financial planning servicesACTIVEMar 5, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance