USPTO serial 76257753
CEREBREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CEREBREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Minatoku, Tokyo, JP
Minatoku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Jordan
Yoshiro NakaMats6-31-10 SHIMOUMA SETAGAYA-KUTOKYO, JAPAN, NY 154-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely medical treatment chairs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |