Drawing for SUB.BIONIC

USPTO serial 76257811

SUB.BIONIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUB.BIONIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY M. KEATS

ANTHONY M KEATS KEATS MCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BLVDPENTHOUSE STEBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SERIES OF SOUND RECORDINGS, NAMELY PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS, AND VIDEO TAPES AND CASSETTES FEATURING MUSIC AND MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 3, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 11, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 2, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 14, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 12, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 2, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance