USPTO serial 76257840
UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2005
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Terrebonne, Quebec, CA
Terrebonne, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M. Nath
Gary M. Nath THE NATH LAW GROUP112 South West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP IN THE FIELD OF FERMENTATION, PROTEIN PURIFICATION AND ULTRAFILTRATION UNITS FOR THE PHARMACEUTICAL AND FERMENTATION INDUSTRIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |