Drawing for AB FUNDS TRUST

USPTO serial 76258017

AB FUNDS TRUST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AB FUNDS TRUST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry L. Shosid

LARRY L SHOSID BELL NUNNALLY & MARTIN LLP3232 MCKINNEY AVE STE 1400DALLAS, TX 75204-2429UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY, PROVIDING INVESTMENT AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PROGRAMS, NAMELY, ADMINISTERING RETIREMENT, DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND SEVERANCE PAY PLANS AND PROGRAMS; UNDERWRITING AND ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICAL, DENTAL, DISABILITY, LIFE, ACCIDENT AND PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE; INVESTMENT OF FUNDS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS; AND ADMINISTRATION OF BENEFIT PLANS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO INDIVIDUALS WITH LIMITED FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND SPECIAL NEEDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2005NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
Dec 13, 2004TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 13, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2004PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2004IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance