Drawing for SURF-X

USPTO serial 76258107

SURF-X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURF-X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristine M. Boylan

Kristine M. Boylan Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Disinfectant, germicide, virucide and anti-microbial solution for use in medical and dental facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 16, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 16, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 12, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 23, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance