Drawing for COOL BITE

USPTO serial 76258231

COOL BITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOL BITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY LAW OFFICE OF JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Frozen desserts, namely, frozen custard pie, frozen custard sandwiches, wafers and cakesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 20021.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 10, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Sep 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance