Drawing for SMART TIPS

USPTO serial 76258237

SMART TIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART TIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIC P. SCHELLIN

ERIC P SCHELLIN6831 CLOISTERS DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Individual liquid applicator in the dental field, namely, a dauber for applying a small quantity of liquid to a toothACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 16, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 1, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 25, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Feb 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 14, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 31, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance