Drawing for COHIBA CARIBBEAN'S FINEST RUM

USPTO serial 76258320

COHIBA CARIBBEAN'S FINEST RUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 652
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COHIBA CARIBBEAN'S FINEST RUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033RumACTIVEMar 11, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 30, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 28, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 12, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 6, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 23, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 28, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 20, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 20, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 23, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 29, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 16, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 10, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 2, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 22, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 13, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 7, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 1, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 1, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 19, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 13, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 7, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 3, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 3, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 3, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 6, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 3, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 14, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 6, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 3, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 20, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 18, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 31, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 11, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 11, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 11, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 10, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 27, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 2, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance