USPTO serial 76258347
RUMBLE IN THE JUNGLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUMBLE IN THE JUNGLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Vranum
PETER J VRANUM JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH & COX355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, Namely Shirts, Vests, Sweaters, Shoes, Caps, Bandannas, Shorts, Sweat Shirts, Pants, Belts For Clothing, Socks, Swimwear, Jackets, Rainwear, Blouses, Dresses, Footwear, Hosiery, Scarves, Hats, Head Bands, Pajamas and Sleepwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |