USPTO serial 76258381
NERVANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NERVANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lake Oswego, OR
BELLEVUE, WA
BELLEVUE, WA
Lake Oswego, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard T. Black
Richard T. Black Foster Pepper PLLC1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, maintenance, and repair of computer hardware, computer peripherals, computer systems, and computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 4, 2005 |
| 038 | Electronic mail services, namely, message filtering, processing, and delivery of electronic mail; telecommunications services, namely automated telecommunications service, namely routing and forwarding voice and data communications via electronic, electric, telephone and digital transmission; electronic, electric, wireless, and digital transmission of data, sound, and video communications; electronic mail services; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2005 |
| 039 | Storage services in connection with electronic media, namely, images, text, and audio data; electronic storage of voice and data communications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2005 |
| 041 | Educational and training services, namely, classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the operation and use of computer hardware and software systems; educational services, namely, conducting workshops and seminars related to computer software design and development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 13, 2005 |
| 042 | Computer system and software consultation; computer services, namely, designing, developing and updating computer systems and software for others; computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing search and analysis engines for obtaining and analyzing data and information on a global computer network; technical support services for others, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems of computer network users via telephone, email, and remote or localized computer network; installation, maintenance, and repair of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 4, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ForeSight Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NERVANA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NERVANA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ForeSight Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NERVANA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |