USPTO serial 76258397
INFOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rose A. Hagan
LISA M MARTENS FISH & RICHARDSON PC4350 LA JOLLA VLG DR STE 500SAN DIEGO, CA 92122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software development tool, namely, computer software for making accessibility enhancements to files used by web sites, intranets, and web-enabled applications to ensure accessibility and usability for persons with disabilities in addition to ensuring compliance with Federal laws relating to such accessibility | ABANDONED | Nov 3, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |