USPTO serial 76258501
NERVANA INFORMATION NERVOUS SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NERVANA INFORMATION NERVOUS SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Lowe
DAVID A LOWE BLACK LOWE & GRAHAM PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer operating programs; computer software used to connect various computers into a computer network; computer software for use in database management, document processing, and computer security; computer software for searching, accessing, organizing, storing, manipulating, and managing semantic and hierarchical data structures and heterogeneous data, collections of data and information on a wide variety of computer hardware and across multiple devices, namely workstation, desktop, laptop, handheld, and smart phones in a wired and wireless computer network; computer software for use in database management, namely, for active and automated collaborative filtering of data; computer search engine software, namely software for providing semantic transport-driven, query sourced inputs, namely, natural language inputs, across multiple devices, namely workstation, desktop, laptop, handheld, palm, and smart phones in a wired and wireless computer network; computer software for tracking, modeling, developing, deploying, utilizing, retrieving, recording, storing, searching, mining, accessing, managing, publishing, editing and semantic encoding of collections of data, data information workflow and other heterogeneous information or data sources in terrestrial and wireless local and global computer networks; desktop publishing software; computer software for use in exchanging and transporting data among multiple computer applications, operating systems and utility programs; computer software for providing interoperability among different software applications, operating systems and utility programs; computer software for providing user-customizable data presentment via a user interface; computer software for searching, accessing, storing and managing hierarchical data structures and semi-structured and unstructured data in the field of data representation technology, namely structured and unstructured semantically-based software for use in the development of computer programs, programming languages, development kits and compilers; computer software for use in developing, compiling, and executing other computer software on computers, computer networks, and global computer networks; computer software for use in navigating, browsing, transferring information, and distributing and viewing other computer software and information an computers, computer networks, and global computer networks; computer software for use in content-based database management in the field of data representation technology; computer software for use in content-based database management for use as a database management tool in the field data representation technology that may be downloaded from local and global computer networks; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines, articles, newsletters, manuals, summaries and reports in the fields of computer and information technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |