USPTO serial 76258552
NEWMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEWMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Kelly
TIMOTHY J KELLY FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) EXECUTING MARKETING CAMPAIGNS FOR OTHERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE AND LEASE OF COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, AND BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | REAL ESTATE SERVICES, NAMELY, COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE; FINANCIAL INVESTMENT IN THE FIELD OF COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE; FACILITIES, PROPERTY AND ASSET MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENT SALES AND FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DEBT AND EQUITY FINANCING, MERCHANT BANKING, FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTING SERVICES; COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL SERVICES, CORPORATE REAL ESTATE ADVISORY SERVICES, NAMELY, FINANCIAL AND STRATEGIC PLANNING; AND PORTFOLIO DATABASE MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction services, namely, project management in connection with custom construction and building renovation, construction management and supervision; planning, laying out and custom construction of office space; installation and of telecommunications equipment, all of the foregoing in connection with commercial real estate only | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |