USPTO serial 76258720
KLASS TIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2006
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KLASS TIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A. DE C.V.
TEPOTZOTLAN, MX
Other trademarks owned by CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A. DE C.V.
HOUSTON, TX, US
CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A. DE C.V.
TEPOTZOTLAN, MX
Other trademarks owned by CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A. DE C.V.
Houston, TX, US
Houston, TX, US
Houston, TX, US
CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.
ESTADO DE MEXICO, MX
Other trademarks owned by CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | [ Food items, namely, fruit flavored flavorings for milk made with cereal and vitamins; ] atole, namely, corn based drink in the nature of a food based beverage consisting primarily of maize and porridge; [ hot chocolate and hot chocolate mixes, coffee and powdered coffee mixes, spices, bakery desserts, arroz con leche, namely, rice puddings; puddings; natilla, namely, vanilla pudding and flan ] | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by KLASS TIME, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Klass Time, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Klass Time, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KLASS TIME LTD
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KLASS TIME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 15, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |