USPTO serial 76258865
OXYLENE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3552391Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2008
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OXYLENE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ward Brown
WARD BROWN CHRISTENSEN OCONNOR JOHNSON1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-1344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Welding torch fuel and cutting torch fuel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |