USPTO serial 76259313
DR.DERM...SCIENCE FOR BETTER SKIN CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DR.DERM...SCIENCE FOR BETTER SKIN CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM A MCCAMPBELL III
WILLIAM A MCCAMPBELL III MCCAMPBELL & WALTHALL PC1250 24TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1186UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Human skin care preparations for skin health, restoration and maintenance such as-- skin cleanser, skin toner, skin moisturizer; skin care preparations for protection from the sun; preparations to promote and maintain healthy and youthful looking skin; skin care preparations against aging(eg--"Anti-aging Complex", "C-Facelift", "Retin C"); specialized skin preparations for eyes, lips, nails and hair; skin care therapy preparations (such as "Red Anti-bruise Cream", "Salicure", "Acne Control"); and whitening preparation for fade-out skin pigmentation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |