USPTO serial 76259333
RESPONSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3013524Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 8, 2005
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RESPONSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Ann Gregory
JULIE ANN GREGORY MIDDLETON REUTLINGER2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TWRLOUISVILLE, KY 40202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | hockey blades and hockey replacement blades | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 7, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |