USPTO serial 76259339
FOFO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOFO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-80539 Muenchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Boutell
DAVID G BOUTELL FLYNN THIEL BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | CUTLERY AND HAND-OPERATED INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY HUNTING KNIVES, SPORT KNIVES, FISHING KNIVES, POCKET KNIVES, FORKS AND SPOONS; CUTTING AND STABBING WEAPONS, NAMELY, SWORDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS; JEWELRY; PRECIOUS GEMSTONES; TIMEKEEPING INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY CLOCKS AND WATCHES; PRECIOUS METALS IN GENERAL, NAMELY, CRAFT OBJECTS AND ART OBJECTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | AUCTIONEERING SERVICES; RETAIL STORE AND COMMISSIONED SALES SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF JEWELRY AND PRECIOUS GEMSTONES, TIMEKEEPING INSTRUMENTS, CUTLERY AND HAND-OPERATED INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |