USPTO serial 76259816
PERCEPTIVE INFORMATICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2006
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERCEPTIVE INFORMATICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Harvey
D. Peter Harvey HARVEY SISKIND LLPFour Embarcadero Center, 39th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-4115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Voice and data systems, comprised of computer software for use in electronic data capture, database management of patient enrollment information, patient randomization information, and drug development data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 12, 2001 |
| 038 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ACCESS TO INTERACTIVE VOICE AND DATA SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CAPTURING ELECTRONIC DATA AND MANAGING PATIENT ENROLLMENT INFORMATION AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2000 |
| 042 | APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR USE IN MANAGING THE DRUG DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, CAPTURING ELECTRONIC DATA, AND MANAGING PATIENT ENROLLMENT INFORMATION AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT DATA; DEVELOPING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MEDICAL DEVICE COMPANIES AND HOSTING SERVICE RELATED THERETO; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, A COMPUTER NETWORK PORTAL WEB SITE HAVING INFORMATION AND NEWS OF INTEREST TO PHARMACEUTICAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MEDICAL DEVICE INDUSTRIES; MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES; MEDICAL IMAGING AND RELATED ANALYSIS AND PROCESSING SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Perceptive Informatics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Perceptive Informatics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Perceptive Informatics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PERCEPTIVE INFORMATICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |