USPTO serial 76259826
KLASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KLASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A. DE C.V.
TEPOTZOTLAN, MX
Other trademarks owned by CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A. DE C.V.
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN, WHITE,ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food items, namely, canned meats and soups | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORACIÓN INDUSTRIAL ALIMENTICIA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Klass Time, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Klass Time, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Klass Time, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named KLASS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |