USPTO serial 76259907
EMPOWER PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMPOWER PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Menker
JAMES R MENKER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP1100 NEW YORK AVE NW 9TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED DATA MANAGEMENT AND DATABASE MANAGEMENT FOR OTHERS | ABANDONED | May 7, 2001 |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NAMELY, ANALYZING AND ASSESSING THE BUSINESS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS OF OTHERS AND RECOMMENDING METHODS AND PROCEDURES FOR INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF EMPLOYEES RESPONSIBLE FOR SALES MANAGEMENT, SALES ANALYSIS, CATEGORY MANAGEMENT AND CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT | ABANDONED | May 7, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |