USPTO serial 76260578
AURA LUXURIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AURA LUXURIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shiseido - IBC JV Company, LLC
New York, NY
Shiseido - IBC JV Company, LLC
New York, NY
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, INC.
REYNOLDS, OH
VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
REYNOLDSBURG, OH
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Colucci
FRANK J COLUCCI COLUCCI & UMANSMANHATTAN TWR101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022-6000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | personal care products, namely, aftershave, antiperspirant, artificial nails, non-medicated astringent for the face, non-medicated astringent for the skin, bath beads, bath oil, non-medicated bath salts, blush, body glitter, body mist, body oil, bubble bath, cleanser for the face, cologne, cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, cream for the body, cream for the cuticles, cream for the eyes, cream for the face, cream for the hands, deodorant, essential oils, exfoliators for the skin, exfoliators for the feet, eye gels, eye makeup pencils, eye shadow, face mist, facial masks, non-medicated foot soak, non-medicated foot spray, foundation, fragrant body splash, hair conditioner, hair dyes, hair glitter, hair rinses, hair shampoo, hair spray; hair styling gel, hair styling mousse, lotion for the body, lotion for the face, non-medicated lotion for the feet, lotion for the hands, non-medicated lip balm, lip gloss, lip makeup pencils, lipstick, makeup for the body, makeup for the face, makeup remover, mascara, massage lotion, massage oil, nail corrector pens, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail stencils, non-medicated blemish stick, non-medicated mood enhancing skin massage ointment, non-medicated mood enhancing skin cream, oil blotting sheets for the skin, perfume, powder for the body, powder for the face, non-medicated powder for the feet, pumice stones for personal use, non-medicated salt scrubs for the skin, shaving cream, shower gel, soap for the body, soap for the face, soap for the hands, sun block for the skin, suntan lotion for the body, suntan lotion for the face, sunless tanning lotion for the body, sunless tanning lotion for the face, pre-suntanning lotion for the body, pre-suntanning lotion for the face, post-suntanning lotion for the body, post-suntanning lotion for the face and talcum powder | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services and mail order catalog services featuring personal care products and towels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shiseido - IBC JV Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Shiseido - IBC JV Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTIMATE BEAUTY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named AURA LUXURIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |