USPTO serial 76260863
INTELLI-CLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLI-CLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Juan Capistrano, CA
VASCULAR CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA
VASCULAR CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Krebs
ROBERT E KREBS BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATH IS LLPP O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical products, namely, vascular occlusion clips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HysteRx, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VASCULAR CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VASCULAR CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named INTELLI-CLIP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |