USPTO serial 76260899
STOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark L. Weber,
MARK L WEBER RENNER KENNER GREIVE BOBAK TAYLOR ET ALFOURTH FL FIRST NATIONAL TWRAKRON, OH 44308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | POWER STEERING FLUID, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR FUEL AND DIESEL FUEL TREATMENT, FUEL INJECTION CLEANER CHEMICAL ADDITIVE, OCTANE BOOSTER FUEL CHEMICAL ADDITIVE | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | CARBURETOR AND CHOKE CLEANING PREPARATIONS, AUTOMOBILE WAX, CLEANING PREPARATION FOR AUTOMOBILE BRAKES AND PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION FLUID | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |