USPTO serial 76261171
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Elgin
MONICA VALENCIA FRANKLIN ESQ TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM INCONE CNN CTRATLANTA, GA 30303-2762UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Series of pre-recorded video cassettes featuring cooking programs; series of pre-recorded audio cassettes and compact disks featuring soundtracks, music of theme songs and other sound recordings; computer software; video game cartridges; video game interactive controls; sunglasses, eyeglass cases; mouse pads; and decorative refrigerator magnets | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |