USPTO serial 76261652
CYNETA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYNETA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott R. Rhoades
SCOTT R RHOADES STRASBURGER & PRICE LLP901 MAIN ST STE 4300DALLAS, TX 75250UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software or a system consisting of computer software and computer hardware, all of which manages and adapts the content and network protocols of data of wireless LAN, WAN, mobile, fixed and satellite networks, thereby facilitating the delivery of applications and services to the business and consumer market over wired and wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultation, namely, consultation concerning turnkey projects in the wireless, Internet and related communication engineering field | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Telecommunications consultation, namely, consultation concerning turnkey projects in the wireless, networking, Internet and related communication engineering field; technical consultation in the field of network engineering, namely, consultation concerning turnkey projects; computer software design for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CYNETA NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CYNETA NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CYNETA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |