USPTO serial 76261787
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Burton
POWER BUYING DEALERS, USA INC1301 W 22ND ST STE 1007OAK BROOK, IL 60521UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | signs utilized in the construction and operation of retail convenience store, namely, electronic and neon signs | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | Fixtures utilized in the construction and operation of retail convenience stores, namely, refrigerated beverage dispensing units; freezers | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | furniture utilized in the construction and operation of retail convenience stores, namely, sales and display counters | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | portable coolers utilized in the construction and operation of retail convenience stores, namely, portable beverage coolers | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |